Skip to main content
HCHospitalCostData

Sioux Falls Va Medical Center vs St Elizabeth Dearborn Hospital

Side-by-side hospital cost and quality comparison from CMS Medicare data

This comparison crosses state lines: Sioux Falls Va Medical Center (South Dakota) versus St Elizabeth Dearborn Hospital (Indiana). Cost differences are influenced by the federal wage-index adjustment in addition to hospital-specific cost structure. Average payments are close: $10,945 vs $11,078, only 1% apart. With cost close to tied, the quality measures do most of the work in the value-rubric comparison. Sioux Falls Va Medical Center comes out slightly ahead.

With costs this close, the choice between these two hospitals turns on the quality measure set, geographic convenience, or insurance-network status rather than payment-per-procedure differences.

Verdict

Sioux Falls Va Medical Center earns a higher Value Score of 85/100 (A) compared to St Elizabeth Dearborn Hospital at 85/100 (A). Average Medicare payment differs by $133 ($10,945 vs $11,078). Sioux Falls Va Medical Center holds a 5-star CMS rating.

MetricSioux Falls Va Medical CenterSt Elizabeth Dearborn Hospital
Value Score
Composite of price, quality, and outcomes
85/100 (A)85/100 (A)
CMS Quality Rating★★★★★ (5/5)★★★★★ (5/5)
Avg Payment
Average Medicare payment across all procedures
$10,945*$11,078
Outcome Score50/10050/100
Emergency ServicesYesYes
Hospital TypeAcute Care - Veterans AdministrationAcute Care Hospitals
OwnershipVeterans Health AdministrationGovernment - Local
LocationSioux Falls, SDLawrenceburg, IN
Procedures Tracked1718

Sioux Falls Va Medical Center earns a higher Value Score of 85/100 (A) compared to St Elizabeth Dearborn Hospital at 85/100 (A). Average Medicare payment differs by $133 ($10,945 vs $11,078). Sioux Falls Va Medical Center holds a 5-star CMS rating.

Explore More

Source: CMS Hospital Price Transparency, 2026.